Life on Florida’s West Coast

Stem Cell Research Controversy

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting Suncoast Scribe!

I know that a lot of people hear the term stem cell research and immediately their mind goes to the issue of cloned cells or cells harvested from embryos. I agree there is controversy in the research conducted on those sorts of cells.

However, did you know that many experts agree that stem cells are easily harvested from a woman’s menstrual blood? How cool is that? Not only it is a source without controversy, it means that a whole lot of women have access to a very easy way to save stem cells that they could potentially use in the future to help if they encounter a serious illness, like Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s. Lately, there have been major medical journal publications about the science.

C_elle_kit_imageA company called C’elle offers an easy system to harvest such cells. They supply collection kits and then store the cells for you. Menstrual stem cells are a 100% match for the female donor and some research even implies that they match first degree relatives, like a child or parent.

Right now C’elle is offering a promotional price that will save you $200 on start-up costs. So, now is a good time to look into the system if you have been thinking about it. Collecting and saving blood that has usable stem cells is a definite investment in your own future, health, and well-being. The reasons people store menstrual blood is much like the reasons people bank their children’s cord blood. Take a look at the C’elle client testimonial section of the website if you want more insight into the reasons behind people using the system.

Sponsored by C'elle

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.